🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test this week after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."